The non profit Institute on Statelessness provides this useful background piece on the issues now facing the more than 200,000 persons and their descendants whom the international community considers "stateless" while the Dominican Republic considers them "Haitian".
Many of these persons were brought under contract to cut cane under arrangements between governments, many were also trafficked
NOTE . There are probably more than ONE MILLION Haitian immigrants in the Dominican Republic. The VAST majority of them were NOT born here and have NO CLAIM to citizenship.
Many more were simply born here at Dominican hospitals.. an estimated 10,000 pregnant Haitians a year come to take advantage of the advanced medical assistance. The Dominican Republic takes very good care of these women, even bringing them from the border up to five hours away, by ambulance, These children used to be able to have a tenous claim on citizenship,,, which was litigated in international courts,,, but their parents were not legal, considered in transit,
The Dominican Republic is a small and poor nation and has come under great attack from many nations, from human rights groups, from Haitians, from all sorts of activist,.
But it is only a small portion of the Haitian Dominicans.. or DominicanHaitians..who can make any sort of claim to legal rights to Dominican papers.
It is important that those who are actually concerned for those who are at RISK here take the time to understand ALL sides of the issue. And that includes the United States, the DR CAFTA treaty, the deal with the sugar cane producers.... all.. all ..all... alll....
I ask for a bit of attention here as a member of the Vincini family now owns one of the major newspapers, There is a lot of fear being built up here in the country.. fear of a pacific invasion by Haitians, fear that the international community is pressuring the Dominican Republic to unite with Haiti. Generally .. FEAR.
So, the more people who can hold this in the Light.. the better,
The following is from the Institute Report....
Statelessness is a ‘smaller’ problem in the Americas than in other
parts of the world in terms of absolute numbers. UNHCR reports a
total of 210,032 persons under its statelessness mandate in the
Americas, almost all of whom are found in a single country, the
Dominican Republic. There also does not appear to be a serious
issue of known but unmapped situations of statelessness, such as that
which exists in Africa. Only one further country in the Americas has
been identified as presenting a significant, but as yet unquantifiable,
problem of statelessness.
Table 4: Countries in the Americas with over 10,000 stateless persons or
marked with *
Dominican Republic 210,000
As mentioned earlier in this report, an important reason for this low
number of stateless persons is the principle of jus soli which is common
to the countries in the western hemisphere: by granting nationality
to all persons born on the territory, regardless of parentage or other
circumstance, any situation of statelessness fades away automatically
with the next generation enjoying birth-right citizenship. As discussed
next, the two counties in which statelessness has surfaced as a real
problem are those in which restrictions have been placed on the jus
soli conferral of nationality.
UNHCR reported figure (end 2013): 210,000
Statelessness in the Dominican Republic (DR) concerns persons of
Haitian descent. Until 2010, the Constitution of the Dominican Republic
granted nationality automatically to any person born on Dominican
soil, with only the limited exception of children whose parents were
diplomats or ‘in transit’ in the country at the time. Individuals born
in the country thus acquired Dominican nationality, whether their
births were recorded in the Civil Registry or not. In practice, this
THE WORLD’S STATELESS
narrow exception has long been applied in such a way as to deny
many children of (presumed)128 Haitian descent access to Dominican
nationality, often leaving them stateless – despite an Inter-American
Court ruling which condemned these practices.129 The General Law
on Migration adopted in 2004 expanded the ‘in transit’ exclusion for
jus soli citizenship to children born to parents considered as ‘nonresidents’,
which is understood to include temporary foreign workers,
tourists and students, among other categories. A 2005 ruling of the
Dominican Supreme Court further expanded this exception to include
all individuals without proof of lawful residence. This expanded
definition of the ‘in transit’ exception was then enshrined in the new
Dominican constitution adopted in 2010. Most recently, in 2013, the
DR’s constitutional court ordered that this new interpretation of ‘in
transit’ be applied to all individuals with Dominican citizenship born
in the DR to migrant parents (i.e. retroactively, as far back as 1929).
This process resulted in the arbitrary deprivation of nationality
on a massive scale. Those affected are left stateless because Haiti
has prohibited dual nationality until 2012130 so those who enjoyed
Dominican nationality could not also be Haitian.
There are no exact figures on how many Dominicans of Haitian descent
are affected by this series of amended laws. A survey jointly conducted
by the National Statistics Office and the UN Fund for Population
(UNFPOA) estimated that 209,912 individuals were born in the DR
of Haitian migrants.
131 This matches the UNHCR figure of 210,000
stateless persons in DR at the end of 2013. The figure, however, captures
only the first generation of persons of Haitian descent, born in the
Dominican Republic. Given that the retroactive stripping of nationality
affected individuals who were born in the country as far back as 1929,
a far larger number of persons lost their entitlement to Dominican
nationality because their parents or grandparents are considered
never to have possessed it. For instance, Juliana Deguis Pierre, whose
case before the constitutional court figures at the centre of the current
problems, has four children herself. If Juliana is no longer considered
128 Often determined arbitrarily or on the basis of racial criteria. 129 Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Yean and Bosico v. Dominican Republic,
Series C, Case 130, 8 September 2005. 130 Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Haiti: Dual citizenship,
including legislation; requirements and procedures for former Haitian citizens
to re-acquire citizenship (2012-January 2013), 8 February 2013, HTI104293.E. 131 See above, note 69.
3 GLOBAL STATELESSNESS STATISTICS
Dominican, they also lost their nationality– yet only she appears in the
statistic of 210,000 persons under UNHCR’s statelessness mandate. It
is not possible, at present, to estimate the size of the further population
affected – i.e. the second, third or even fourth generations born in DR
who were also stripped of their nationality – but the fertility rate in the
Dominican Republic is reported to be 2.8 children per woman.132 Thus,
while there are also some recent legislative developments that look set
to allow an estimated 10% of those affected to regain their Dominican
nationality, the assessment of civil society groups is that statelessness
actually threatens a far larger number of people in DR and the data
reported is significantly underestimating the problem.